The area that the Mountain West is short of in its quest for inclusion as an "Automatic Qualifer Conference"--average computer rating can be easily fixed. I said this over and over in the WAC that it is more important to get a win--any win than it is to lose to a Top 10 team. If your present team has no chance of beating a team (and the losing teams do not), that team shouldn't be on your schedule. Most of the teams in the WAC refused to adopt this scheduling philosophy and that is why Boise State had to leave the conference.
I understand fully about balancing the athletic budget and if you're not getting good home attendance, you need that million-dollar payout with a Texas, Oklahoma, etc. It seems to me that the MWC teams have far greater attendance than the WAC so that shouldn't be an issue. In any case, I am not talking about the budget issues, the scheduling changes are necessary if the conference is serious about attaining BCS status.
Again, a win over Idaho or Arkansas State will get more benefit in the computers than a loss to Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Oregon, or whoever is highly rated. A lot of people are of the misunderstanding that scheduling those teams is going to improve your computer rating--not so, not if you lose to them. So purely from a BCS standpoint, it is much better for the conference's lower teams in any given year (and right now that would be Wyoming, UNLV and New Mexico) to schedule only the lower-level teams of the WAC, MAC, USA and Sun Belt. Once the wins start coming, then the schedule can be upgraded but get the wins first. That not only helps the conference, but helps build the program and generates fan excitement. Games against FCS teams are worthless--some computers don't even count them, and the ones that do give you next to nothing for a win and penalize you a lot for a loss.
So you can already see from the future schedules listed below that some MWC teams have scheduled far too tough, and losing any of those games will hurt the conference. I have shown the future schedules and the estimated impact on the team's computer rating if the favored team wins those games. I have also shown what the schedule needs to be in order for the MWC to attain permanent BCS status and the computer ratings under that scenario. It should be obvious (again leaving all budget issues separate) that the latter route is the way to go.
Future MWC Out-of-Conference Schedules:
Air Force2011:
South Dakota 0
Tennessee State 0
at Navy +2.664
at Notre Dame -(2.975)
Army +1.713
Analysis: As said above, South Dakota and Tennessee State add absolutely nothing, dollars or BCS points, so they shouldn't be scheduled by anyone wanting to get automatic inclusion into the BCS. I realize that Air Force is locked into games with Army and Navy, however Notre Dame shouldn't be scheduled because Air Force cannot beat them and as you can see, they loss 3 points in the computers by playing them. South Dakota, Tennessee State and Notre Dame should be replaced with the best three teams that Air Force can reasonably beat--Examples are Illinois, Miami of Florida, Penn State, Baylor, UConn, BYU, Miami of Ohio, Boston College, Oregon State, Kansas State, Arizona State, Iowa State, Temple, Northwestern, Clemson, Toledo, Colorado, California, Texas, Louisville, Tennessee. I know Air Force can find three of those to play.
Net Gain (Loss) = 1.4020
2012:
Idaho State 0
at Michigan +2.787
Navy +2.664
Army +1.713
Net Gain (Loss) = 7.1640
Analysis: Idaho State is as said a no-no. Michigan and Navy are perfect and Army is a team Air Force has to play. Overall, the type of schedule that can get the MWC an automatic BCS berth. But for an even better chance, drop Idaho State and add one of the teams above. San Jose State and New Mexico State would be better than Idaho State.
2013:
Colgate 0
at Navy +2.664
Army +1.713
Notre Dame -(2.975)
Net Gain (Loss) = 1.4020
Analysis: Again, they have an FCS team--gotta' get away from that. And Notre Dame should be replaced by one of the suggested teams. The MWC will never get meet the second criterion if their teams gain a grand total of one point each on the season. Won't happen.
Boise State2011:
at Georgia .8
at Toledo .812
Tulsa 1.917
Nevada 2.544
at Fresno State 1.180
Net Gain (Loss) = 7.2530
This overall is a good schedule. No FCS teams. Georgia and Toledo don't add as much as other teams but I also understand few teams will play the Broncos so again, overall a good schedule. Boise State would be favored to add 7 points to their computer rating OOC. If every MWC team did that, they would top the Big East.
2012:
at Michigan State 3.892
Miami of Ohio 1.267
BYU 1.212
Net Gain (Loss) = 6.3710 (Incomplete)
Depending on the schedule with Hawai'i, Boise State could add a game here. Overall, 6 points gained from 3 OOC games is very good. They should try to schedule more teams like Michigan State if possible. Arkansas, Missouri, Alabama and Wisconsin are suggestions.
2013:
at Washington 1.648
at BYU 1.212
Net Gain (Loss) = 2.860 (Incomplete)
Boise State can add at least one game here and it has to be at home, thus limiting their possibilities. Washington is probably good but they need to schedule tougher teams than BYU.
2014:
at Mississippi .226
BYU 1.212
Net Gain (Loss) = 1.438 (Incomplete)
Mississippi has to get a lot better for this game to help much. And again, drop BYU.
Colorado State2011:
Northern Colorado 0
Colorado -2.084
at Utah State 3.636
San Jose State 2.290
Net Gain (Loss) = 3.8420
Not a bad schedule. Utah State and San Jose State are exactly the teams that the Rams should be scheduling right now. Try to get some wins and get that rating up there. As you can see, the game with Colorado gets you nothing but reduced computer points. Wait to play them until your teams consistently win 9-10 games. And definitely drop Northern Colorado.
2012:
at Colorado -2.084
North Dakota State 0
at San Jose State 2.290
vs. Utah State 3.636
Net gain (Loss) = 3.8420
The temptation is to add those FCS teams but when you're all about getting your computer rating up, it's a killer. So drop ND State and Colorado and add teams like New Mexico State and Washington State. UTEP, Kent State, Rice, Tulane and UAB are other possibilities.
2013:
Colorado -2.084
at Tulsa -1.108
Cal Poly 0
UTEP 3.546
Net Gain (Loss) = .3540
Very poor schedule. Again, to top the Big East you need big gains, not .35 points per team. That's a non-factor. As you can see, UTEP is a team that gives Colorado State an excellent chance to move up in the ratings because they have a very good chance of winning.
Fresno State2011:
California 2.656
at Nebraska -(2.029)
North Dakota 0
Mississippi 1.962
Boise State (-1.174)
Net Gain (Loss) 1.4150
Fresno State traditionally schedules too tough and this is the case. Cal at home is winnable so that's very doable. They aren't going to beat Nebraska in the foreseeable future so drop them and North Dakota. Fresno and Boise State shouldn't have scheduled each other in 2011--better for them both to schedule games they can win than to schedule a game where there is a guaranteed loser. Ole Miss is a perfect game for Fresno. Overall, not a good schedule for the Mountain West to improve. Here are some better suggestions than Nebraska and North Dakota--Oregon State, Kansas State, Arizona State, Iowa State, Clemson, now Colorado is a great team for Fresno to schedule, others are UCLA, UTEP and Washington State.
2012:
Colorado 2.6880
Net Gain (Loss) 2.6880 (Incomplete)
And here Fresno has Colorado--a perfect game. If they add 2 more like that, they move up nearly 8 points in the computers.
2013:
Rutgers 1.655
Cal Poly 0
at Colorado 2.6880
Net Gain (Loss) 4.3430
Rutgers is another good team to schedule. If they can add another add one of the suggested teams above and it won't be bad.
Hawai'i2011:
Colorado 1.928
at Washington -(3.157)
at UNLV .678
UC Davis 0
Tulane .800
BYU 1.377
Net Gain (Loss) 1.6260
Analysis: Very bad schedule. Colorado is a good team and BYU isn't bad. They won't beat Washington in Seattle but they do get a return visit that they can win so that's not bad. Again, they shouldn't have scheduled UNLV since they will be conference mates but that was probably already set up. UC Davis is worthless and Tulane isn't up to Hawai'i's caliber--they can do better. Notre Dame, Texas, Iowa, Washington, Navy, Arizona, Penn State, Baylor and Oregon State would all add huge points to Hawai'i because they are very solid teams that Hawai'i can beat. Colorado, California and Washington State are other games that should be willing to go to Hawai'i.
2012:
at USC -(2.824)
at BYU 1.377
Lamar 0
South Alabama 0
Net Gain (Loss) (-1.447)
Analysis: Very poor schedule. USC is OK because they get a return visit and can win in Honolulu. Two FCS teams? Replace those three teams with three of the suggested ones.
2013:
USC 2.823
at Oregon State 2.317
BYU 1.377
at Navy 2.711
Army 1.658
Net Gain (Loss) 10.886
Analysis: See the difference from 2012 to 2013? This is probably about as good as you can get. Adding nearly 11 points for the MWC would be huge and all of those are winnable games. Super schedule.
2014:
Washington 2.809
Oregon State 2.317
at Colorado 1.928
Net Gain (Loss) 7.054
Analysis: Another solid schedule. All three of those are exactly who Hawai'i should be scheduling right now.
Nevada2011:
at Oregon -(3.318)
at Texas Tech 2.014
Boise State -(2.378)
UNLV - (.183)
New Mexico -(.774)
Net Gain (Loss) -(4.639)
Analysis: Very poor schedule. Nevada has zero chance of beating Oregon in Eugene, especially with Kaepernick graduating--what were they thinking? All that does is lose your team a game and three computer points. Boise State, UNLV and New Mexico are future conference mates so not only does it not get the conference anywhere, but it loses you points as well. Texas Tech is the only good scheduling move, the others are horrible. Replace the four mentioned with teams like Utah, Iowa, USC, Washington, Navy, Arizona, Baylor, BYU and Oregon State.
2012:
at Washington 1.879
Net Gain 1.879 (Incomplete)
Analysis: And there you see Washington, a good team to add. Add 2-3 from the ones above and they've got a schedule that can benefit the conference.
2013:
at UCLA .669
Oregon -(3.318)
Net Loss -(2.6490) (Incomplete)
Analysis: Again, they have zero chance of beating Oregon. Don't dream so big that you lose the progress you've made. UCLA is a good team to add. Washington State is another. Southern Mississippi, Houston and some of the other top teams from the "non-BCS" conferences are good as well for Nevada.
2014:
at Arizona 1.7410
Net Gain 1.7410 (Incomplete)
Analysis: Arizona is a good move because Nevada has a good chance of winning that one. Add 2 of the others and they'll contribute to the MWC gaining admission.
New Mexico2011:
at Nevada .887
at Arkansas .917
Texas Tech -(.226)
Sam Houston State 0
New Mexico State 3.243
Net Gain: 4.8210
Analysis: When you have struggled, you don't look for bodybag games; you look for teams you can beat to get your fan base energized. Texas Tech is a pretty good add--they likely won't win but it doesn't hurt them much. New Mexico State is a perfect game. Arkansas is a solid enough team where it will add a bit but they can do much better. When you're #114, you add other teams that are in the 100's, such as Tulane, Washington State, Central Michigan, Ball State, Louisiana-Lafayette, San Jose State, Bowling Green, Eastern Michigan. Those aren't going to make headlines, but what they will do is give your team a chance to win games, an infinitely better strategy than playing the best teams in the world.
2012:
at UTEP -(2.092)
at Texas -(1.315)
Texas Tech -(.226)
at New Mexico State -(2.981)
Net Loss: -(6.6140)
Analysis: Horrible schedule. They could possibly beat New Mexico State, so that could turn positive. But definitely not Texas and Texas Tech in the same year--what did they have, delusions of grandeur? Texas Tech perhaps but not Texas and not UTEP. Get the games you can win and be reasonable about assessing your chances.
San Diego State2011:
Cal Poly 0
at Army 1.987
Washington State .083
at Michigan 2.972
Fresno State 2.752
Net Gain: 7.7940
Analysis: A solid schedule overall. Michigan and Army are perfect games. Again, the Fresno game will hurt one or the other. They could have either Washington State or Cal Poly but not both. Add New Mexico State, San Jose State or Utah State if they want a solid home win but don't put a FCS on the schedule. Other than that, great job.
2012:
at Cincinnati 1.711
Army 1.987
North Dakota 0
San Jose State .202
Net Gain: 3.9000
Analysis: Here, they have both ND and San Jose State. One is OK but definitely not 2--they add a grand total of 2/10th's of a point for two games when they could do much better. Cincinnati and Army are great games. Other possibilities are: Washington, Navy, Arizona, Michigan, Illinois, BYU and Oregon State.
2013:
at Utah State 1.412
San Jose State .202
Oregon State 2.613
Net Gain: 4.2270
Analysis: Here's a pretty good schedule, although I wouldn't schedule both Utah State and San Jose State in the same year when the teams above could give them far more mileage.
UNLV2011:
at Wisconsin (.142)
at Washington State -(3.137)
Hawai'i -(.735)
at Nevada .197
Net Loss: -(3.8170)
Analysis: Very bad schedule, and not just because Nevada and Hawai'i are future conference mates. They won't beat Wisconsin. They are similar to New Mexico--schedule teams like Central Michigan, UAB, Rice, San Jose State, Utah State and New Mexico State.
2012:
Minnesota -(2.753)
Washington State 3.282
at Utah State -(2.437)
Florida Atlantic 2.974
Net Gain: 1.066
Analysis: Another poor schedule that won't help either UNLV or the MWC. Washington State can be beaten at home so that was a decent team to add in a return visit. UNLV with all that Las Vegas has to offer shouldn't have to do a 1 and 1 with Utah State and a loss there would kill the MWC. Minnesota is far too good a team to go to. If they must have a bodybag game, they should have aimed higher such as Oregon, Alabama, Auburn, LSU, etc. Losses to those teams wouldn't hurt their rating as much as Minnesota will. Florida Atlantic on the schedule--absolutely perfect for this time in UNLV football. Win that and others like the ones I suggested and they'll make progress for the football program and for the Mountain West.
2013:
at Minnesota -(2.753)
Arizona -(1.147)
Western Illinois 0
at Utah State -(2.437)
Net Loss: -(6.337)
Analysis: Another poor schedule. Arizona is a possibility but Western Illinois offers them nothing. There are plenty of FBS teams that UNLV can get to come to Las Vegas and beat.
Wyoming
2011:
Weber State 0
Texas State 0
at Bowling Green 2.146
Nebraska -(.554)
at Utah State -(2.820)
Net Loss: -(1.228)
Analysis: Get rid of Weber State and Texas State; the Mountain West is too good of a conference for those games. Nebraska is not winnable, but again if they have to have a bodybag game to balance the budget, Nebraska is probably as good as any. Bowling Green is a perfect game for Wyoming--Utah State is too good to travel to. Add the teams I suggested for New Mexico and UNLV.
2012:
at Texas -(2.076)
Toledo -(1.977)
Cal Poly 0
at Idaho -(2.511)
Southern Utah 0
Net Loss: -(6.564)
Analysis: Another horrible schedule. They won't beat Texas, Toledo or Idaho, not at this juncture. And Cal Poly and Southern Utah get them nowhere.
2013:
Utah State -(2.820)
at Oregon .579
Net Gain: -(2.2300)
Analysis: Wyoming has at least one game to add here and I hope it is someone like New Mexico State, San Jose State or Washington State, someone like that. Unless things change in a hurry, Wyoming won't beat Utah State and Oregon is just a payday although if you're going to have one, that's a good team to schedule.
Thursday, June 2, 2011
Chaz Anderson Becomes Fourth Bronco Recruit
I was hoping for this one. Chaz Anderson has committed to Boise State, being the fourth member of the Class of 2012 to commit before the school year.
Anderson needs Bronco conditioning coach Tim Socha to take him under his wing; he's 6-0, 175, but if that can be accomplished he'll do fine. He excels at backpedaling, is quick, and can recover quickly as well. Anderson is the cousin of current Bronco cornerback Bryan Douglas. He chose Boise State over interest from USC and UCLA.
He joins quarterback Nick Patti, cornerback Marcus Rios and wide receiver Shane Rhodes in the 2012 Class thus far. Those are two outstanding corners--can you imagine those two locking down both sides? Awesome news for Bronco fans!
Anderson needs Bronco conditioning coach Tim Socha to take him under his wing; he's 6-0, 175, but if that can be accomplished he'll do fine. He excels at backpedaling, is quick, and can recover quickly as well. Anderson is the cousin of current Bronco cornerback Bryan Douglas. He chose Boise State over interest from USC and UCLA.
He joins quarterback Nick Patti, cornerback Marcus Rios and wide receiver Shane Rhodes in the 2012 Class thus far. Those are two outstanding corners--can you imagine those two locking down both sides? Awesome news for Bronco fans!
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Athlon Chooses Top Ten Boise State Football Players of All-Time
Boise State fans will tell you that ranking Bronco players is like ranking kids. They all have their good points and bad points, but you love them all.
I'll be on KTIK-Radio in Boise this afternoon (around 4:20) discussing Athlon's selections and including some players that also need to be included in the discussion.
http://www.athlonsports.com/college-football/slideshows/top-ten-greatest-boise-state-broncos#1
I'll be on KTIK-Radio in Boise this afternoon (around 4:20) discussing Athlon's selections and including some players that also need to be included in the discussion.
http://www.athlonsports.com/college-football/slideshows/top-ten-greatest-boise-state-broncos#1
Three Broncos on Sporting News All-America Team
The preseason All-America lists continue to roll in. The Sporting News has theirs out, and three Broncos are on it. Tackle Nate Potter and defensive tackle Billy Winn both made the first team while quarterback Kellen Moore was a second-team selection. Of course, the ones that count are the postseason teams.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Kickoff Set for Boise State-Nevada
One of the most anticipated college football games of the season is the rematch of Boise State vs. Nevada in Bronco Stadium this fall. We now know the kickoff time--it will be 12:30 p.m. October 1.
Boise State Defensive Line Called the "Best in the Nation" by Athlon Sports
The annual preseason magazine has done its research and today released their rankings for the upcoming football season. Among the highlights for Boise State, the Bronco defensive line was ranked #1 in the nation, Boise State quarterbacks are #2 and the Boise State offensive line was ranked #5. The Boise State football team also was ranked #5 in the preseason Athlon rankings of college football teams.
Monday, May 30, 2011
This Week's SFL Schedule
In case you missed it, since the summer is an off-time for Boise State news, I decided to create my own. There's an online simulation site in which you can match teams from the past against each other. Out of curiosity, I decided to join their site and play football teams from Boise State against each other to see what the software determined to be the strongest team. The downside is that it only goes back to 2001. However, those teams represent the top period in Boise State football.
I set up a 12-game season and while I was at it, I also took the National Champions from the last 10 years and placed them in what I called the "Simulation Football League". Each team will play all teams in their division once and have three random games against teams from the other divisions. The site comes complete with game results and statistics. I have simulated two weeks' worth of games thus far--you can find details below on this blog.
Many people not only in Boise but around the country felt perhaps the 2006 Boise State team was in the right location (Glendale, Arizona) but perhaps in the wrong game (the Fiesta Bowl instead of the National Championship). Lo and behold, a matchup between that famous Bronco team and the mythical National Champion Florida team highlights this week's schedule. That will be interesting to see the outcome. The 2010 Boise State-2004 National Champion USC contest will also be fun to watch. Also, we knew how good the "Leave No Doubt" team of 2002 was, but how will they fare against the Liberty Bowl team of 2004?
Here is this week's schedule:
2006 Boise State vs. 2006 Florida
2007 Boise State vs. 2009 Alabama
2008 Boise State vs. 2002 Ohio State
2010 Boise State vs. 2004 USC
2001 Boise State vs. 2003 Boise State
2002 Boise State vs. 2004 Boise State
2005 Boise State vs. 2009 Boise State
2001 Miami, FL vs. 2005 Texas
2003 LSU vs. 2010 Auburn
2007 LSU vs. 2008 Florida
I set up a 12-game season and while I was at it, I also took the National Champions from the last 10 years and placed them in what I called the "Simulation Football League". Each team will play all teams in their division once and have three random games against teams from the other divisions. The site comes complete with game results and statistics. I have simulated two weeks' worth of games thus far--you can find details below on this blog.
Many people not only in Boise but around the country felt perhaps the 2006 Boise State team was in the right location (Glendale, Arizona) but perhaps in the wrong game (the Fiesta Bowl instead of the National Championship). Lo and behold, a matchup between that famous Bronco team and the mythical National Champion Florida team highlights this week's schedule. That will be interesting to see the outcome. The 2010 Boise State-2004 National Champion USC contest will also be fun to watch. Also, we knew how good the "Leave No Doubt" team of 2002 was, but how will they fare against the Liberty Bowl team of 2004?
Here is this week's schedule:
2006 Boise State vs. 2006 Florida
2007 Boise State vs. 2009 Alabama
2008 Boise State vs. 2002 Ohio State
2010 Boise State vs. 2004 USC
2001 Boise State vs. 2003 Boise State
2002 Boise State vs. 2004 Boise State
2005 Boise State vs. 2009 Boise State
2001 Miami, FL vs. 2005 Texas
2003 LSU vs. 2010 Auburn
2007 LSU vs. 2008 Florida
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Viitala and Nelson Qualify for Nationals
Two Broncos are headed to the NCAA National Track & Field Championships.
Long jumper Eetu Viitala and hammer thrower Alex Nelson both finished in the top 12 at the Western Regionals over the weekend in Eugene, Oregon to earn a ticket to the national meet in Des Moines June 8-11. Viitala finished 11th with a jump of 24-5.75 while Nelson tossed the hammer 209-feet, 3-inches to finish eighth.
Congratulations to these great student-athletes and best of luck in Des Moines!
Long jumper Eetu Viitala and hammer thrower Alex Nelson both finished in the top 12 at the Western Regionals over the weekend in Eugene, Oregon to earn a ticket to the national meet in Des Moines June 8-11. Viitala finished 11th with a jump of 24-5.75 while Nelson tossed the hammer 209-feet, 3-inches to finish eighth.
Congratulations to these great student-athletes and best of luck in Des Moines!
Can Anyone Top Doug Scott?
No one has been able to top Doug Scott among defensive linemen at Boise State. The future Montreal Alouettes star (pictured at left below) had 325 career tackles from 1976-1979, more than 40 ahead of Randy Trautman, while current Defensive Coordinator Pete Kwiatkowski is far ahead of any of his current players with 261.
You can view this record, as well as any others, at any time by clicking the "FB Records" tab at the top of the blog.
Top Tackles by a Defensive Lineman:
You can view this record, as well as any others, at any time by clicking the "FB Records" tab at the top of the blog.
Top Tackles by a Defensive Lineman:
1. Doug Scott (325) 1976-1979
2. Randy Trautman (285) 1978-1981
3. Pete Kwiatkowski (261) 1984-1987
4. Erik Helgeson (223) 1987-1990
5. Glenn Simonton (220) 1981-1984
5. Marcus Koch (213) 1982-1985
7. Shawn Anderson (183) 1988-1991
8. Chris Wing (176) 1994-1996
9. Chris Malmgren(173) 1976-1977
10. Chris Shepherd (172) 1990-1992, 1994
11. Sione Fifita (171) 1993-1996
12. Ryan Winterswyk (167) 2007-2010
13. Louis Ray (165) 1988-1991
14. Pete Poumele (164) 1974-1975
15. Michel Bourgeau (152) 1980-1983
16. Mike Greever (148) 1968, 1971-1972
17. Mark Goodman (147) 1971-1973
18. Lance Sellers (146) 1983-1986
19. Rex Walters (145) 1985-1986
20. Mike Johnson (140) 1982-1985
21. Greg Sasser (139) 1998-2001
22. Jon Rydman (133) 1996-1999
23. Andrew Browning (132) 2003-2006
23. Joe O'Brien (132) 1993-1994
25. Todd Gilkey (128) 1988-1991
26. Durelle Goodloe (120) 1989-1992
27. Blessing Bird (119) 1971-1973
28. Travis Thompson (117) 1994-1995
29. Saia Misa, Jr. (116) 1974-1975
30. Vince Mendiola (114) 1975-1977
31. Doug Borah (108) 1970-1972
32. Bobby Hammer (107) 1999-2002
33. Mark Humphries (106) 1977-1978
34. Alex Guerrero (105) 2002-2005
34. Nick Schlekeway (105) 2004-2007
36. Jeff Caves (102) 1980-1983
37. Mike G. Williams (100) 2003-2006
38. Dane Oldham (98) 2000-2003
38. Billy Winn (98) 2008-current
40. Chico Mills (96) 1973-1974
41. Ivan Rounds (91) 1977
42. Bobby Setzer (90) 1997-1998
42. Greg Sabala (90) 1990-1993
44. Pete Skow (88) 1968-1971
44. Mike T. Williams (88) 2003-2006
46. Ron Franklin (81) 1973-1974
46. Ron Franklin (81) 1973-1974
47. Shea McClellin (80) 2008-current
48. Puni Alefaio (79) 1992-1993
49. Chase Baker (78) 2008-2010
49. Willie Tufono (78) 1978-1979
51. Paul Allen (67) 2000-2003
52. Julius Roberts (65) 2001-2004
53. Lawrence Hines (63) 1987-1988
54. John Rade (62) 1981-1982
55. Rick Gore (59) 1986-1987
56. Jeff Hunt (57) 1986-1987
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)